What does it mean to go on the record?
Going on the record refers to a source providing information to a journalist that can be attributed directly to them by name. When a source agrees to go on the record, they are giving permission for their statements to be quoted and attributed to them in the journalist’s reporting. This means that the information can be used in a news article, broadcast, or other form of media with the source’s name attached to it.
How does being on the record differ from speaking off the record or on background?
When a source speaks off the record, they are providing information to a journalist with the understanding that it will not be used in the journalist’s reporting. This information is typically shared in confidence and is not for publication. On the other hand, speaking on background means that the information can be used in the journalist’s reporting, but the source’s name will not be revealed. This allows the journalist to attribute the information to a general description of the source, such as a “senior official” or “industry insider.”
What are the benefits of going on the record for a source?
Going on the record can provide several benefits for a source. By putting their name to the information they provide, sources can establish credibility and take ownership of their statements. This can help to shape the narrative and ensure that their perspective is accurately represented in the reporting. Additionally, going on the record can help sources build relationships with journalists and potentially increase their visibility or influence in their field.
How does being on the record impact the credibility of a journalist’s reporting?
When a source goes on the record, it adds a layer of transparency and accountability to the journalist’s reporting. By attributing information directly to a named source, journalists can demonstrate the reliability of their reporting and provide readers with a clear understanding of where the information is coming from. This can help to build trust with the audience and enhance the credibility of the journalist and their news organization.
What are the ethical considerations when a source requests to go on or off the record?
Ethical considerations come into play when a source requests to go on or off the record. Journalists must carefully consider the implications of honoring these requests and weigh the importance of protecting their sources with the need to provide accurate and transparent reporting. It is essential for journalists to clearly communicate the terms of going on or off the record with their sources and ensure that both parties understand the potential consequences of their decision.
How can journalists ensure that sources understand the implications of going on the record?
To ensure that sources understand the implications of going on the record, journalists should have a clear and open conversation with them about the process. This includes explaining what it means to go on the record, how their information will be used, and the potential impact on their reputation or relationships. Journalists should also provide sources with the opportunity to ask questions and seek clarification before making a decision. By fostering open communication and transparency, journalists can help sources make informed choices about how they want to participate in the reporting process.